How a minor character in Guardians of the Galaxy dominated the sequel. How the costumes for the Guardians of the Galaxy were created. Still from the film Guardians of the Galaxy.

After the release of the science fiction film Guardians of the Galaxy on the big screen, its characters became very popular. Of particular interest is the tree-like creature Groot. Small figurines literally flood the Internet and are sold for decent money. In this material we will tell you how to make Groot from Guardians of the Galaxy from polymer clay.

Materials and tools for work:

• baked polymer clay
• working surface: glass or ceramic tiles with a flat, smooth surface
• knife or scalpel
• toothpick
• soft wire
• pliers

How to make Groot from Guardians of the Galaxy

To create a wood pattern, we will need baked polymer clay in beige, brown and dark brown colors. If you want to get a dark wood, then you can take an even darker brown; if it is light, then add more white.

Roll out layers of baked polymer clay of the same thickness and size.

We stack them on top of each other, from dark to light.

Roll out the resulting layer in length and slightly in width. Cut in half and stack the halves on top of each other.

We repeat several times.

When we like the thickness of the strips, we cut the resulting layer into three or four parts, depending on the length.

Using toothpicks or wooden skewers of different thicknesses, press the grooves on the cut pieces across the strip pattern.

We roll tubes of appropriate thickness from dark brown plastic and place them in the grooves. This will help create the knot pattern.

Stack the layers.

Squeeze it a little on all sides and cut across the knots into strips of equal thickness.

We lay out the strips in the wood pattern. You can change the sequence and sides of the strips as you like.

Roll out by hand or using a pasta machine. We need a thin layer, because we will use it to wrap the figure.

Using pliers, we assemble a frame from soft wire. The head is a loop, a base for the body and arms.

We create a figure from the remains of unnecessary plastic.

We give a pose by bending our arms and torso.

Now we wrap the body and head in a layer with a wood pattern.

We wrap our hands in separate pieces.

Carefully smooth out all joints. We form fingers, hair and roots.

Use a blade to cut through the mouth and eyes. For the eyes we will need pieces of black plastic.

Now, using a toothpick, scratch grooves along the entire figure that coincide with the grain of the wood. The thickness and pressure can be varied to create texture. You can make indentations in the places of knots.

This is what Groot looks like ready to bake.

We send it to bake in a jar of suitable size. This way the shape of the hair and roots will not change, and there will be no fingerprints left in places where the figure would be pressed against the glass. Bake according to the instructions for polymer clay.

After the figure has cooled, you can sand it a little to remove excess shavings from scratching with a toothpick. Then carefully cover the figure with acrylic paint. White - if you want to get a lighter figure or black and dark brown - for a dark one.

Let the paint almost dry and wash it off wet wipe paint from smooth surfaces. The paint will remain in the grooves, highlighting the texture. This figurine of a character named Groot can be placed in an individual pot or placed next to an existing plant.

Groot, a fighting talking tree who knows only one phrase (“I am Groot”), sacrificed himself in the first Guardians of the Galaxy to save his friends, but managed to survive and was reborn in the finale as a small dancing tree. The screenplay pleased the audience so much that Baby Groot suddenly became almost the main character: for his sake, the director even changed the plot of the sequel. Why is the piece of wood so honored?

It's very simple: little Groot brought the Marvel and Disney studios a lot of money, bypassing the movie screens. Although he was not intended to be the highlight of the program (Rocket Raccoon was being prepared for this role), the dancing Baby Groot melted the hearts of the audience, forcing director James Gunn to admit with some surprise: “Groot turned out to be the most popular character in the film.” Figures of the dancing Baby in a flower pot sold in huge quantities even before the film was released on DVD. The studio assures that it “did not expect such an effect,” but the phenomenon was evident, and something had to be done about it. Of course, Groot should have been brought back in the sequel. But return it in what form? After all, the adult Groot was not as popular as his “young” version...

Now we know from the trailers what the studio did: for a significant part of the screen time, Baby Groot acts instead of Groot (again voiced by Vin Diesel, although now, after passing through filters, his voice has become “cartoonish” and completely unrecognizable). He is already older than the tree from the first series, but overall he has become even cuter. And the time allotted to him in commercials has increased noticeably.

Of course, director Gunn assures that the sale of toys had nothing to do with it, but that it just happened that way. First he wrote about it on Twitter, then on Facebook. But along the way, he himself let it slip that he planned to start the sequel not with a little one, but with an already grown Groot. Why did you change your mind in the end? The idea of ​​an adult Groot, he says, "didn't work" (whatever that means).

“Then I came up with the idea of ​​having episode two pick up shortly after the end of episode one, with Groot still being a baby,” Gunn wrote. “And that decision became the key to the whole film, all the pieces suddenly came together.” Moreover, the director even reported that he was afraid that the studio would not allow him to leave Baby Groot in the plot.

You can believe these words or not, but there is a suspicion that if the studio wanted to rake in as much money as possible from little Groot, it would do exactly this: 1) throw the old plot developments into the trash; 2) tied the entire plot to the time zone where Groot remains a baby; 3) would increase his screen time; 4) would slightly change its design in order to release new figures; 5) would allow Groot to grow up in the end to boost sales of “adult” action figures.

In view of all these “coincidences,” it seems that this could not have happened without recommendations from the authorities. From a merchandise point of view, Baby Groot is a new character (he even behaves differently than in the first film, becoming naive and playful a la the immature Pinocchio), and Marvel always welcomes the introduction of additional characters, especially in cases where it is clear in advance that souvenirs with their image will be swept off the shelves.

Still from the film "Guardians of the Galaxy"

Gunn doesn't deny that he understood Baby Groot's financial potential from the start: "I'm not an idiot and I knew that if Baby Groot worked, the whole world would want to buy Groot toys, action figures and plushies..." The director goes on to say, however: " But I wasn't at all sure about that when I was writing this story alone in my office, and it certainly wasn't the driving force behind my decision [to keep Groot as a baby]. I just fell in love with this dude, although at that moment he only lived in my head.”

There is some inconsistency: on the one hand, the director was aware that Baby Groot had become “the most popular character,” but on the other hand, for some reason Gunn “wasn’t sure” that people would want new toys in the form of Groot, and even “ I was afraid” that the studio wouldn’t allow Groot to remain small! That is, he practically begged his bosses to let him make a lot of money for them.

To anyone who knows how much merchandise influences American cinema, such arguments will seem laughable. I, they say, didn’t care about the toys, and if they sell in large quantities, then it’s just a pleasant coincidence. For comparison: it’s as if Michael Bay suddenly said that when filming the sequel to “Transformers”, he did not at all plan to increase sales of toys of the same name and inserted stupid twin robots there for a purely noble purpose - for the sake of powerful development of the plot. That is, he could have said it, but who would have believed it?

After the story that came to light that “Cars 2” was filmed by Pixar only for the sake of selling new figures (which is very noticeable while watching the film), one can only guess how often “souvenirs” become a true “plot engine” in Hollywood. Let's remember, for example, the Ewoks - creatures that appeared on the screen purely for the sake of toy sales... And they really sold with a bang.

IN English language There is even a special word for toyetic (used to refer to any entertainment content with high “souvenir” potential) - before the era of summer blockbusters, this term did not exist, and a toy release was never planned before the film or TV series became a hit. But today, when collecting figurines has become part of pop culture, a “souvenir” can go on sale even before the premiere, so as not to lose those buyers who will rush to stores immediately after the film screening.

And this “souvenir”, conscientiously calculated by marketers, almost always finds a sale. Sometimes it “saves” the entire project (for example, “Godzilla” by Roland Emmerich performed poorly at the box office, but vigorous sales of the “merch” associated with it averted a financial disaster). Moreover, with its huge circulation, it may even be in short supply: for example, Frozen souvenirs sold for more than $5 billion, squeezing out other toys from store shelves for a long time - and still at Christmas 2013 for Anna, Elsa , Olaf and Co. there were real battles between American parents, rushing to make their children happy...

Although the final owner of both “Frozen” and “Guardians of the Galaxy. Part 2 “one is Disney,” director Gunn is for some reason embarrassed to admit that his employers are interested in high revenue. He resolutely rejects accusations of “mercantile agendas.” Apparently, Gunn doesn’t want to look like a toy salesman, but wants to look like a man of art - although it is clear to anyone that all of Hollywood is built on commercialism, and the point of producing commercial films is precisely to make a profit.

The sale of Mickey Mouse items began to bring Walt Disney more money than his cartoons back in 1934, and Walt welcomed this. Moreover, Disney not only became a pioneer in film merchandising, he is still the first in this regard today: the company he created owns the Pixar, Lucasfilm and Marvel studios, which are so successful in toy sales. Over the past quarter century, merch has permeated Hollywood from top to bottom. It is not customary to simply state this openly. After all, consumers really like to think of cinema as art...

Meanwhile, Marvel’s bosses mentioned a year ago that they intended to increase the amount of accompanying “merch” for the release of the sequel, relying specifically on Groot. Gunn may not want to advertise how important the “souvenir” is to Marvel, but the studio itself sees no reason to hide it. What is it?

Vin Diesel is the only actor whose voice was not redubbed in the Russian version of Guardians of the Galaxy, as he recorded Groot's lines in six languages. In the sequel, Diesel went even further and voiced his character in 16 languages ​​- further confirmation that the studio has high hopes for Baby Groot

Groot, we note, is far from the first case of this type. There are plenty of secondary characters who look brighter than the main characters in the history of cinema - take, for example, the saber-toothed Scrat from Ice Age, who became the hallmark of the entire franchise, or the penguins from Madagascar. Of course, the authors were aware that these guys were loved by the audience, so they tried to insert Scrat and the penguins into all subsequent episodes, and mountains of souvenirs were sold primarily thanks to them. The Penguins even earned their own TV series. But adapt the main plot to them? This has never happened before. Therefore, apparently, Gann is embarrassed to call a spade a spade.

Obviously, when Baby Groot's unexpected potential emerged, iron had to be struck without leaving the cash register. Neither Scrat nor the penguins are a “perishable” product: their appearance does not change from series to series. And a grown-up Groot would quickly lose his childish charm and comedy. And it would have sold worse. Therefore, it was necessary to squeeze the maximum out of him while it was still possible. No matter what Gunn says, in our opinion, Baby Groot was inevitable.

Another question: is this bad? Certainly not. Both Marvel and Gunn know their stuff: they make money, but they also don’t forget to entertain the audience. The constant expansion of the cinematic universe by adding new characters has so far been possible for the studio without problems, so Baby Groot certainly won’t spoil the mess, and will certainly amuse everyone.

Moreover, the “souvenirs” also have unconditional benefits for the audience. For example, if it weren’t for merchandise, the legendary Han Solo would have died 30 years ago. Harrison Ford said that at some point he really wanted to kill this Star Wars hero, but George Lucas flatly refused - for the reason that figurines of dead characters sell worse than living ones. The fact is that, thanks to a deal with 20th Century Fox, Lucas always received his main income from licensed “souvenirs” (the studio farmed it out to him because they didn’t really believe in the “toy-ness” of the first film), and now it’s clear that that it was an extremely successful deal, since Yoda and his friends have sold $20 billion worth of toys since 1977. It is not surprising that George did not want to hand over Han Solo, one of his central money makers, to the clutches of death.

Lucas, in general, never hid from his colleagues that it was the sales of toys that laid the financial foundation of his film empire (that is, if he had not succeeded in selling “merch” in the late 70s, there would not have been the world-famous Star Wars universe today). wars"). Moreover, Lucas once even publicly stated that the entire franchise was created just for the sake of toys. That's right: for the sake of toys.

So Khan was not destined to die. How many other public favorites were saved from death thanks to caps, cups, badges and figurines?

...Returning to the title topic, we can’t help but mention this fact: a few months ago, Vin Diesel blurted out that James Gunn wants to make a Guardians of the Galaxy spin-off entirely dedicated to Groot and Rocket. The question arises: if the studio gives the go-ahead, will it be only because of the “toyetic” nature of this couple? I would like to believe that it is not and that the plot of the film itself will be worthy of the idea voiced. But if the money-making Baby Groot appears again in the spin-off, we wouldn't be surprised at all.

Cinemafia has selected 11 of the best scenes from the film for you. But, attention! SPOILERS!

While Guardians of the Galaxy has now crossed the $160 million box office mark, we've rounded up the best scenes. True, you can argue with us.

And, yes, the text contains complete spoilers, including detailed description post-credit scenes. So if you haven't seen the film yet, then blame yourself. We warned you!

Dancing Star-Lord

The second "opening scene" we see after the Marvel title sequence is Star-Lord (aka Peter Quill) dancing on the abandoned planet Morag to the song Come and Get Your Love. This moment is imbued with a non-trivial combination of wit and fun, which creates just the right mood. Right now. Later We get to see Chris Pratt dancing once again as he challenges Ronan the Accuser to a “dance battle.” Let's just say that such a bold technique does not work so harmoniously in every blockbuster.

The Legend of Kevin Bacon

One of the funniest jokes is about Kevin Bacon. When Gamora tells Peter Quill that she is a killer and a warrior, which means she doesn't dance, he... responds (we quote the phrase as it is in the dub):

On my planet there is a legend about people like you. It's called "Free". This story is about how a great hero, his name is Kevin Bacon, taught a whole city of inflated turkeys the great art of dancing. And it was incredible.

To which Gamora replies: “Who fooled these turkeys?” This shows how literally everything is taken on that side of the Galaxy.

Note: The 1984 film Footloose, starring Kevin Bacon, is an American classic. According to the plot, the main character comes to a small provincial town where dancing is prohibited. And only he manages to change these old-fashioned orders.

Rocket jokes on disabled people

The first time we encounter this is during the prison break, when Rocket asks Peter Quill to get him a prosthetic leg from one of the prisoners. A little later, when discussing the plan to attack Ronan's ship, he tries to convince everyone around that the false eye of one of Yondu's Ravagers is the most important element. Even in the most “hot” situations, Raccoon does not lose his signature sense of humor

Rocket's drunken speeches

Perhaps Raccoon's most powerful moment in the film is the scene in the bar where Rocket pours out all his feelings and emotions. In particular, resentment at being called a “pest.” He’s crying because it’s as if he didn’t ask for the laboratory experiments that turned him into a monster to be carried out on him. At this moment we understand that specific humor and insulting others are just a defensive reaction. This scene is truly dramatic because for a moment you completely forget that the Raccoon is just a computer character.

100% asshole

Let's immediately make it clear that in the original it sounds like 100% Dick. Thus, while working out a plan to destroy the Black Aster, Star Lord sends one of the NovaCorps representatives a “dick” message, which says that he, of course, is an “asshole,” but not one hundred percent. And asks for help.

Yondu Udonta and his arrow

Michael Rooker's Yondu is more than just a savage. He managed to turn this character into a very charming one." bad guy" When Yondu's ship crashes, he finds himself surrounded by Ronan's servants. But with the help of his trusty arrow, he calmly deals with twenty opponents. Yondu collects figurines on his dashboard, which, on the one hand, throws us straight back to Firefly, and on the other hand, shows his soulful nature. You know, like bikers who actually work in a flower shop.

Groot's smile

Groot's smile is literally the icing on this Guardians of the Galaxy cake. While making their way to Ronan, Drax, Star-Lord and Groot stumble upon an entire army. Which Groot destroys... hmm... brutally. And then he turns around with an innocent and sincere smile, as if asking: “Did I do something good?” Yes, Groot, you really did a good job.

We are Groot

Towards the end of the film, Groot saves the entire crew by forming a "protective nest" around them. At the same time, the hero, who throughout the entire film utters exactly one phrase - “I Am Groot,” this time says “We Are Groot,” which can be read as “We Are Friends.” Yes, it was possible to do something completely different and give Groot fundamentally different words at the end of the film, but the creators went exactly this way, thereby endowing familiar words with a completely different meaning.

Dancing Groot

The first scene after the short credits shows us dancing little Groot against the backdrop of Drax rubbing his knives after the battle. All this happens to the tune of “I Want You Back” by the Jackson 5. This moment gives the audience its charge of positivity, and people leave the theater smiling (although we know that no one leaves a Marvel movie after the first scene).

Listen, baby. Ain't No Mountain High Enough

The final scene, when Peter Quill finally unpacks his mother's farewell gift - the Awesome mix 2 cassette, literally tears the heart, not without the help of the song Ain't no mountain high enough. We understand that the heroes have finally found not just friends, but new family. Yes, this is a wonderful moment.

Howard the Duck

Yes, here it is, the main spoiler. The post-credits scene shows the hapless Tivan the Collector inspecting the damage to his collection. And then Howard the Duck appears with a snide comment. Fans are still arguing about who gave the voice to Howard - Seth Green, announced on imdb, or Nathan Fillion, whose cameo everyone was waiting for.

UPD. Still Seth Green!

DIY Gru from the movie Guardians of the Galaxy

A popular character from a famous science-fiction action movie may turn out to be yours too. Making a Guardian of the Galaxy figurine with your own hands is not at all difficult. The manufacturing technique is simple, and the result is very realistic. You can use such a figurine at your own discretion: as a figurine for a mini-garden, as an interior decor item, etc.

Materials

Before starting work, prepare:

• wire;
• brown paint;
• clay pots;
• sand;
• stones;
• brushes to add texture;
• salty dough.

Step 1. The very first stage of work will be making the skeleton of the figurine from strong wire. Having outlined the basic proportions and parameters on paper, twist a kind of skeleton of a Guardian of the Galaxy figurine out of wire.

Step 2. Now the figure needs to be shaped. To do this, you need to apply salt dough in pieces onto the wire skeleton. Instead of this material, you can use other plastic and hardening materials, such as polymer clay and much more. Give the shape of a tree with a head to the guardian figurine, form the outline of the face.

Step 3. Roll small sausages of different thicknesses from the dough and, pressing down, place them on top of the mold, starting from the bottom. Give the guard's hands the shape of curved tree branches.

Step 4. Also give the head a characteristic shape. To begin, use the sharp end of the brush to form the eyes and mouth, and use a toothpick and fingers to correct any imperfections. Make “hair” out of sausages. They should resemble broken tree bark.

Step 5. The resulting figurine needs to be painted. First, cover it all with brown. Let the paint dry. Then, using a thin brush, give the wood a deeper texture, closer to natural. Darken all the recesses with a darker shade of brown, and, on the contrary, lighten the convex places.

Use green paint to paint several veins, imitating weaving leaves, and also paint the tips of the finger-branches.

Step 6. After the paint has dried, completely cover the figure with acrylic varnish. Wait for it to dry completely.

Step 7. Take a pot and use dough sausages to put the name of the guard “Groot” on it. Cover the pot and letters with varnish.

Step 8. Pour sand into the bottom of the pot and add glue. Insert a guard figurine into this solution. Let the glue set and harden. Sprinkle the top of the pot with stones and pieces of moss.

Carefully! There are several swear words in the review!

First of all, I want to admit that the ancient prophecy has come true: your humble servant has finally turned into the person he was predicted to turn into. Into a refined movie snob.

While watching "Guardians of the Galaxy" I felt it so clearly that I was even scared. Alas, there is no turning back. From now on, individual funny jokes in a film are not enough for me - I need twisted intellectual humor and complex irony. I refuse to be content with just good special effects and entertainment - now I need a special visual concept, a unique author’s aesthetics and artistry. No other way. Otherwise, I get discouraged and yawn in the middle of the adrenaline-pumping action. I need a complex plot. We need deep characters and unique villains. I demand that the directors do not take me for an idiot and forget the phrase “Why bother – the viewer will eat it anyway.”

No, I don’t grab it anymore. Enough!

So what can I say about Guardians of the Galaxy? It is impossible to criticize this film - it is almost perfect. All I can do is take a dissenting opinion out of my pocket and whack the Guardians over the head. Keep in mind, dear readers: I have my own opinion, and I am not afraid to use it.

Minority Report

I don’t know what I expected from this film... Long before the premiere, I saw Guardians of the Galaxy in the form of a kind of enfant terrible - a “terrible child” in the dull cinematic universe of Marvel comics. The Guardians trailers looked more cheeky and humorous, the digital raccoon blew your mind, and the characters in the film were some kind of losers, not at all like the usual superheroes. Well, the sudden change of setting to a sci-fi adventure promised only advantages.

But what did I see in the end? But I saw a typical Marvel film, which is no different from its predecessors at all. “Guardians” are like hatchery chickens, similar to their brothers to the point of complete indistinguishability. Victim of a photocopier or stamping machine run amok. Clone.

However, first I’ll say something about the pluses - I won’t raise my hand to trash the film. “Guardians of the Galaxy” has a lot to praise for; it’s not for nothing that they have such box office receipts and such ratings.

The visual is the first thing that catches your eye. The computer image is flawlessly drawn - finally, the fantastic scenery has been put together in a breathtakingly cool way! Oh, all these space stations and distant worlds! Those futuristic prisons and starships! Everything looks uncompromisingly chic. And although the described world is thought out in an extremely careless and stupid way (more on this below), from a technical point of view it is a reference work.

Much the same applies to digital characters. Guardians of the Galaxy is the first film I can remember where computer-generated characters are treated as real beings. I had never had this feeling before. Not at all "The Lord of the Rings", neither in "Avatar", nowhere. There, the digital characters, although they were designed very well, were still perceived as cartoons fit into the real environment. The tiny inauthenticity was always present.

It's not in Guardians of the Galaxy. The ever-memorable Raccoon and his bodyguard Groot look like living creatures - you don’t even think about how they are made. They just seem like real heroes, real actors as well as people. I’ll give it my due – it’s quite a strong impression and here I experienced it for the first time.

The last definite plus of “Guardians” is humor. There are a lot of jokes in the film and some of them are really funny. And although I laughed heartily only once (a gag with a prosthetic leg), I smiled quite often.

This ends the film's bright spots. I actively didn’t like everything else.

The fantasy world here is cliched and wretched - one gets the impression that it was invented either for children, or for completely clueless (or undemanding) viewers. I didn't believe in the world of Guardians for one second. I didn’t believe in these planets, prisons, ships. I didn’t believe in pirates, dark lords and technical gadgets. Every millisecond the film makes you think about the stupidity and illogicality of your own universe. And I’m not even talking about the plot, but about the world itself, where a developed planet has no means of space defense, except for light fighters. Where some dark personalities live on dark asteroids, sitting on a throne with rocket engines (that moment when you want to punch your face in with your hand). Where maximum security prisons look like anything but a prison...

The hacky setting is supported by a truly idiotic plot, which is advanced by brainless villains and flat heroes. Frankly, by the end I completely lost the thread of what was happening. Who, what, why, why – don’t care. "Guardians of the Galaxy" can hardly be accused of being boring, but it tires with its superficiality and lack of any depth. It seems like the film is bright and cheerful, the characters are humorous non-stop, everything around is exploding and shooting, but I had to put it with the device. It is not interesting. It's not catchy. The film has no... substance, no substance. This is a two hour video clip.

And I don’t even remember about minor idiocy, like going into outer space without a spacesuit and other space cranberries. The level of care Guardians of the Galaxy has for its own content is simply amazing. A little more and Marvel Studios will reach absolute zero - the level of nonsense Michael Bay. There is only one step left until this happens.

Of course, many will say that I am unfair (and schoolchildren will speak even more rudely), but I am only reporting on my own impressions. Despite the humor and entertainment, the movie seemed completely miserable. Guardians of the Galaxy is a cliche without a soul. The film does not look like a product of creativity and imagination - it looks like a well-oiled mechanism for making money, moreover, assembled from standard parts according to an approved scheme (which Marvel has been shamelessly using for five years).

Guardians of the Galaxy is just an attraction, and not a very good one. However, I am not saying that he is incapable of entertaining. I see from the reviews that he is capable. But I didn't like it. Seasick.

In general, forgive me, Guardians fans, but for me Marvel has finally turned into an evil empire selling soulless shit. I don’t even know why I still watch their films - the life path of this studio has long been clear and understandable to me, and how it will end is also clear.

Thank you for your attention. Maine was with you and his votum separatum.

Score: six. Exclusively for technicality.

Reviewer: Maine House

_________________

See also:

Comments (23)

Well done, Maine. At least someone told the truth.

Oh you snob.

Modest, but honest IMHO, just another good entertainment, but I don’t understand why fans elevate it to the level of a “masterpiece.”
Not in terms of the subject, of course, but in terms of comics, everyone has long been waiting for something new from Zack Snyder (Illustrated Man, Cobalt 60), but he is firmly hooked on comics and even signed up for two parts of the Justice League at once after BpS. It’s nice, of course, to see him in such a project, and he himself is a big fan of comics, but DAMN... in short, it’s bad for you or it’ll do anyway)

Main House answers:

Zack Snyder is great at filming comics - “Spartans”, “Watchmen” and “CHS” won’t let you lie. But I don't want him to become a studio whore for the DC Universe. Nolan, while filming Bats, managed to create amazing original films during the breaks. From Zach I would also like to see as much original material as possible (in the manner of Sucker Punch), and not endless sequels. And if he is forced to make ten Superman & Company films, it will be a waste of his potential, that's all. The experience of Marvel Studios shows that any guy with minimal experience can shoot special effects comic molasses - there are instructions, why bother? :) And Snyder making movies about Superman is like Leonardo da Vinci drawing the design of chewing gum inserts.
IMHO :)

Jokester answers:

Well, Bps could turn out to be a really good film, purely Snyderian, one might say. Back in 2009, after Watchmen, he was eager to make something based on The Dark Knight Returns, a brutal comic about Batman, who got fed up with all the crap around him and even managed to kick Superman’s ass. IMHO, of course, but in my opinion, he deliberately took up ChiS simply to present this material in any form, but most importantly with his own tricks. For the sake of Batman a la Watchmen, I'm ready to forgive everything, especially Larry Fong, the signature cameraman on the case, but... DAMN, it's still two parts of the Justice League?!
P.S. having earned money from Warners, he can produce independent films, but Rise of an Empire, IMHO, is just a semi-parody of the Spartans themselves, not reaching the original. Well, at least we’ll see Lest the photographer with his script, with or without Bodrov at the helm)

Main House answers:

Snyder is Snyder - naturally, Bps will be at least a good film and will certainly have great visuals. I just think it’s completely irrational to waste the talents of such a gifted guy to create another film about Superman. However, I will go to the cinema to see it in any case, unlike the second “Avengers” and other assembly line productions.
P.S. But I still like Rise of an Empire :) I won’t even say that it’s worse than the original - it’s just less fresh. The original Spartans had revolutionary visuals. The continuation in this regard is no longer capable of surprising.

Victor answers:

Maine, we’ve already talked about the rise of the empire, but I still can’t resist – the first film is primarily about the content (wrapped in beautiful visuals, yes), and in the second there’s nothing left besides the visuals. There are no ideas, and the embittered Eva Green alone cannot make the film last no matter how hard we try.

Oh, how =) Maine watched Guardians)) I saw it in the cinema and I really liked the film (turning a blind eye to the stupidity and wretchedness described in the review - I was relaxing) =) What can I not say about going to see this film again... I liked it the second time less =) And I didn’t even watch it on HD =)

PS: Are you going to watch Age of Ultron? =)

Main House answers:

I won’t watch “Ultron” - why? :) I already know what will happen there. Tony Stark will humor and tease everyone and everything. Once again the world will be in danger - some villain with the motive “I am evil.” And of course, the script will feature another crazy artifact, on which everything will depend. Several new characters will be introduced into the action - in secondary roles, just so that the faces become familiar and then separate films can be made about them. There will definitely be several references to previous films in the universe. The following is expected from the action: 1) a chase 2) a general final battle with the participation of all heroes 3) a battle in the city or above it.
In the end, one of the heroes will either be killed (for fun, to be returned later) or he will disappear in some parallel dimension. Yes, and I’m almost sure that there will be a bold reference to the same “Guardians of the Galaxy”.
In general, no change on the comics front :)

And I just looked and didn’t think about anything, beautiful video with a simple plot and unobtrusive humor, I gave it 8/10. Just a relaxing movie.

It's like approaching shawarma from the perspective of a gourmet: D Fast food is fast food. Although some especially gifted people put potatoes and sauerkraut in shawarma, from which even this food does not satisfy what it should. But here, in my opinion, this is not the case. This is true for the mentioned transformers. Be-be-be...

Maine, I just watched a new fantasy. movie Time Patrol (aka Predestination) with Ethan Hawke. I’ll say right away that there are practically no stunning special effects. But the film hooked me in a completely different way. This is what I would call art-house fiction. No, there are no art-house inflections and glitches, everything is in the Hollywood cover, it just hooked me more than even the same Interstaller.
I advise you to take a look.